When preparing a presentation for a meeting I am skipping tables wherever possible, and replace them by a suitable graph or plot. This helps the audiences the grasp the content more easily and less explanations are usually necessary (given that the plot are made well). But sometimes, its hard to transfer the information of a table into a figure and there’s no other choice than putting values in rows and columns. My personal policy is not to exceed a size of 3 x 3 to give the audience a chance to read the table in a reasonable amount of time. If I have only two columns, I allow myself to go to 5 rows at max. So as a general rule I would suggest not to present more than 10 values totally, plus the corresponding column and raw labels. I have seen many presentations from colleagues who are using tables a lot and some of them display sizes of 10 x 10 or even larger. When I see something like this in a meeting, I usually don’t try to read the table. Not only because the fonts are too small to be read, but just because there’s not enough time to read 100 values and compare them across each other. I looked on the web and saw that Garr Reynolds has assembled some really good examples, although all of them might not be suitable for scientific presentations as they orient rather on sales presentations.
Popularity: 2%
For those of you who don’t know what it is, please check this site for more information about the